Friday, July 29, 2005

Countdown: The Coming UK Coup

The Coming UK Coup Audio mp3

The London bombings were not only to bolster the NWO's Iraq campaign,
but mark a new phase in the G8's rolling global coup. Next stop Britain.

Listen Here: DSL Stereo or 56K mp3
Truth Radio: Fintan Dunne & Kathy McMahon.

by Fintan Dunne, Editor 30th July, 2005

We present unambiguous political analysis showing there is a covert timeline to ensure that in October of this year, the U.K. will railroaded into becoming a Homeland Security State --using the same methodology which established the prototype in the United States.

Just as in the U.S., a campaign of state-sponsored fake terrorism --supplemented with psychological warfare against the domestic population-- is the modus operandi. The London bombings were the opening gambit.

The evidence for this covert timeline begins back on 19th May, 2004 --in what seemed a relatively trivial incident at the time:
Prime Minister Tony Blair was hit by a missile thrown from a gallery in the House of Commons today.

Protestors hurled purple powder at the Premier striking him between the shoulder blades and clattering to the floor. Dads’ rights pressure group Fathers 4 Justice later claimed responsibility for the attack. [Source]
So what was that all about?

It was about laying the groundwork for a coup. Here's how.

First, consider the timing of the second 'failed' London bombings: early on the 21st July, 2005. Just in time to help usher in the renewal of the Patriot Act laws in the U.S.:
The House voted Thursday to extend the USA Patriot Act, the nation's main anti-terrorism tool, just hours after televisions in the Capitol beamed images of a new attack in London... The House debate included frequent references to the attacks earlier in the day, two weeks after larger London blasts that killed 56, including four suicide bombers. [Source]
Which was a particularly nice piece of timing -suiting George Bush rather than Al-Qaida.

Interestingly enough, that day was also the day that parliament in the U.K. recessed for the summer break --thus British politicians never got the chance to articulate their response to the events of the day. That's also quite convenient for Tony Blair.

Not to worry, the August break will soon be over. Come September the MPs will be back on the benches to fill the temporary democratic deficit. But...

Not this year they won't.

Because of that 'powder attack' on Tony Blair, a temporary security screen --already erected to protect MP's-- is scheduled to be replaced with a more permanent structure in early September.

Ministers argue that a long recess is necessary to give workmen time to construct a permanent security screen at the front of the Commons public gallery. [Source]
So parliament cannot sit. And later in September is a washout too, because that's the traditional political party conference season. Meaning it will be October 10th before MPs are back on the job. The first item on their agenda then being the Government's proposed terrorism legislation.

All of which means that Blair & Co. have a clear run of 80 days without parliamentary oversight or review of their actions and with the propaganda bonus of a Labor Party Annual Conference in the interim. That gives the Government every chance to set the scene for pushing through parliament a range of measures which will likely seriously impact civil liberties.

Senior British police have asked UK Prime Minister Tony Blair for draconian new powers, including the right to detain a suspect for up to three months without charge, a new specialist U.K. border-security agency along the lines of U.S. Homeland Security and removal of a suspect's right to silence. The police body further wants to be able to attack and close down Web sites in order to to "suppress inappropriate internet usage." [Source]

Parliamentarians will likely be predisposed to approve the measures after weeks of security alerts, bomb scares, and Keystone Cop mayhem including roundups of suspects. Their mood will no doubt be affected by a brand new security screen seperating them from the electoral rabble and enhancing the sense of threat.

And who knows, perhaps Al-Qaida will continue to 'attack' with optimal political timing --ahead of the vote on the new laws. Perhaps even causing those laws to be strengthened at the last minute. Nothing, as you see, is being left to chance.

In the light of all this, it might be fruitful to look again at the group whose intemperate Commons powder-throwing is turning out to be so advantageous for the U.K. end of the 'War on Terror'.

It was U. K. fathers' rights group Fathers4Justice who staged the stunt. Fathers4Justice are somewhat notorious for their 'superhero' protests. Group member David Chick, dressed as Spiderman, once climbed a crane beside London's Tower Bridge and four members of the group --dressed as Spiderman, Superman, Batman and Robin-- have climbed Bristol's Clifton Suspension Bridge.
But father's rights is not all publicity pranks:
Solicitors representing women whose ex-partners are members of Fathers4Justice claim they have been sent abusive e-mails, had their offices vandalised and stormed by protesters and have even been targeted at home.

In an even more sinister development, scores of family law solicitors specialising in children's issues were sent hoax letter bombs last autumn. Similar hoaxes - made of marzipan with wires attached to it - were also sent to offices of the Child and Family Courts Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), which deals with custody issues. [Source]
All of which is virtually a carbon copy of events 'down under' --in Britain's stalwart partner in the War on Terror: Australia.

Where a militant father's rights group called the Blackshirts has staged similar actions while wearing masks and paramilitary uniforms. The militant's leader John Abbott defended their often intimidatory acts saying: "we're here to encourage protect and defend marriage, the family and the children." [Source]

Asture readers might dispute that assertion and see both groups as classic, if not carricature, covert provocateurs who serve to smear father's rights to help keep men and women divided and thus conquered. That's a tactic of rulership as old as the Romans. Someone is pulling the strings of these groups.

That's puts a new context on the May, 2004 'powder incident' which has led to British MP's strategic absense this September. And it implies there is indeed a carefully planned timeline guiding all these events.

Seeing events in this light, the timing of the second 'Al-Qaida' attacks in London look like the political theatre it surely was. But, what about the first London bombs attack on 7/7 -coincident with the G8 meeting in Gleneagles, Scotland?

Was it just randomly fortunate timing that the attacks wrongfooted the campaign for African debt relief and put the G8 leaders back in the driving seat on the issue? What of the pied pipers of the debt relief movement -the beknighted Bob Geldof who posed for photo opportunities with British Chancellor, Gordon Brown and sidekick Bono with his close links to figures in the Bush Administration? Were these media darlings encouraged to lead their movement into a perfectly timed trap designed to raise hopes of a breakthrough and then cynically dash them?

If so, then we are seeing only the tip of the iceberg in media coverage of current events.

Behind the scenes, those whom the 'suicided' former weapons inspector, Dr. David Kelly referred to a 'dark actors' have their hands subtly on the tiller.

And they plan to guide the ship of state into a prolonged war on self-sponsored 'terrorism' -stripping away civil rights under cover of 'terrorist attacks' whose timing benefits the political agenda of the global players.

Which means it's about time the left in politics woke up to the fact that they are being played for fools by a media/political circus where most actors are dancing to a covert agenda.

It's a long political way from John Kerry to George Galloway, but both are typical of a left leadership ever-so-fortunately showered with media attention. Just as were Geldof and Bono in the run-up to the G8 meeting.

No wonder we are getting nowhere in resisting the imperial machinations of the G8. No wonder we are getting nowhere campaigning for justice and equity for the colonial slaves of the world. No wonder we are scratching our heads as governments posing to 'defend our freedoms' from terrorism --are nevertheless stealthily removing those freedoms, brick by legislative brick.

So, let's cut through the smokescreen of lies and misdirection.

We know who is orchestrating the bombings which plague us. Ruthless 'terrorists' who hate our freedoms. These terrorists know no freedom themselves. The onerous demands of the lust for power have become for them their prison of shallow political theatre. And from within that prison, their shadow hates our freedoms.

It's time to clear the stage of these 'dark actors'. Before thousands more are killed in their fake terror attacks; and tens of thousands in their imperial war adventures.

It's time to do it now. Before we run out of time.

Our netradio broadcast on this theme MP3: 56k DSL
More Audio Shows Here

See also:
How Black Ops Staged the London Bombings
Rise of the G8 New World Order
Live8 is an NWO Psyop - so is AIDS

Thursday, July 28, 2005

Police Admit Brazilian did not Jump Turnstile

The family of the Brazilian man shot dead by police officers on the London Underground say the police have privately admitted he did not jump the ticket barrier, and had not been wearing a padded jacket.

Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, was shot eight times and kiled last Friday by police officers at Stockwell Tube station, in south London.

Four of Mr Menezes's cousins gave a press conference in the Holiday Inn hotel in Camden, north London, yesterday before flying his body home to Brazil for burial.

The family were adamant that the version of events given by the police at the time of Mr Menezes's killing was contrary to what they had been told in private.

They insisted he had not jumped the ticket barrier and had not been wearing a padded jacket.

Vivien Figueiredo, 22, said she had asked to be shown the CCTV footage from the station, but had not yet been allowed to view it.

However, she said she was told by police officers that her cousin had been wearing a denim jacket and had used his travel card to get through the station barrier: "I spoke to police on that day and the police told me that he had used a travel card.

Miss Figueiredo said she was angered by reports that one of the officers involved in the shooting had gone on holiday, paid for by the Metropolitan Police. "They should not be exterminating people unjustly, which is what happened to my cousin Jean," She said.

Patricia da Silva Armani, 31, said her cousin had always been law-abiding: "I want to make it very clear about his status. He was legal in this country and he was allowed to work and study.

"We urge the British government to punish the officers involved, I implore them to punish those responsible. I call on people around the world to give support so that his death is not in vain."

Gareth Peirce, the human rights lawyer for the family said: "A man has died who committed no crime. There is intense public discussion but very little public discussion as to whether those who killed him committed a crime."

Ms Peirce said senior political figures had given their interpretation of what happened before any proper inquiry had taken place and called for transparency in any future investigation.

A vigil to mark one week since Mr Menezes's death will take place on Friday in Parliament Square.

See also:
Did Police Lie About Stakeout on Brazilian?
Stockwell Murder Shatters Brazilian Family

Iraqi Journalist's Death Looks Like Assassination

by Fintan Dunne, Editor 28 July, 2005

Latest information about the death of an Iraqi journalist who was investigating the activities of the death squads in Iraq, shows he was shot with his hands up in a scene which resembles an assassination zone.

Knight-Ridder reporter, Yasser Salihee, 30, was killed on June 24, 2005 while on his for gasoline to bring his family to the swimming pool. He came into a Baghdad road intersection where every exit had been blocked by U.S. Humvees. He died of a single shot to the head.

A propaganda report by, which interviews the supposed sniper --but does not identify him-- paints the incident as an unpremiditated, accidental killing. But details of the scene and the events now revealed have the hallmarks of a staged assassination.

At the time Salihee entered the intersection, all other exits were blocked. And as he approached, another car already in place began 'turning' in front of Salihee to bring him to a halt in the killing zone and ensure a perfect shot. The windshield of his car appears to be pierced by only one bullet -the fatal one. Four fingers of his right hand were missing -possibly in vain self-defense.
The victim and the killer
Yasser Salihee was an Iraqi journalist. Joe was an American sniper.
On June 24, 2005, fate brought them together on a Baghdad street.

By Phillip Robertson

...Falah Hassan Jasim, a plumber who was standing on the south side of the street when the shooting happened, told me, "There was a Lada car turning in the road and he [Salihee] tried to pass it, and then he pulled over. The Americans shot him, they were standing in the middle of the street." According to Hassan, Salihee was stopped with his hands up when the snipers fired at him. I asked Hassan about the interval between the shots and he said, "It was like this, pop, pop, pop," saying the bullets were fired in less than a few seconds.

Another witness, Hamid Mohammed Aboud, a 25-year-old ice seller who works at the corner of Amel Al Shabi and Rafaee streets, said, "Both Americans were firing at the same time, the shots were very close together."

Was Salihee's car stopped? There does not appear to be definitive proof one way or the other. Ayman Salihee, Yasser's younger brother, said that when he arrived at the intersection, he saw that the Espero's transmission was in neutral and that his brother's feet were on the brake. In the police report, a diagram shows that Salihee's car was pulled all the way over to the left side of the street, parallel to the curb.

The evidence suggests that Salihee might have had his hands raised. Four fingers on Salihee's right hand were missing. Although it's possible that a bullet other than the fatal bullet caused the injury (there were conflicting stories that an Iraqi soldier might also have fired), the missing fingers and the angle of fire are consistent with a bullet striking a raised hand.

The details may be murky, but in retrospect it is fairly clear what happened. The real problem was that the platoon did not put out cones and wire -- if they had Yasser would have stopped. Then came the fateful turning car, followed by another car coming around it. The soldiers were on edge, but they seem to have followed their rules of engagement. It was a typical misunderstanding, of the sort that happens all the time in Iraq.
See Also: The U.S. is Murdering Journalists in Iraq

Video Enhancement Reveals London Bomber


Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Ops in Disarray Over London Bombs Probe

Click for better quality

Altered Original of Luton CCTV in Circulation
One fake was bad enough -now there are two!

Cointelpro elements in the alternative media have rushed to try blunt the impact of recent analysis of a faked CCTV image appearing to show the alleged 7/7 London bombers.

Our report, published last Saturday [23rd July], demonstrated 13 clear signs of fakery in the CCTV photo of the four alleged bombers at Luton station, released by the London Metropolitan Police. That evidence is already hitting forums and alternative sites across the internet and the world. So also is our accompanying article explaining how the London bombings were actually carried out.

With the cover-story crumbling, the behind-the-scenes boys had to do some quick damage limitation. And so, has just published a photo essay warning people away from questioning the CCTV images released by UK police.

Michael Rivero's series of photos tries to show that one of the 13 anomalies --where a railing appears superimposed in front of one of the men-- is not really an anomaly at all. The man's arm is bent at the elbow, says Rivero -and so the railing is behind him. [see pic] Which might be a good point. But there is one problem. And it's a big one.

Rivero is not using the original Luton CCTV image. He's using an altered version.

In the Rivero version, the railing has been digitally altered so that it bends downwards near the man's body. You could prove anything with an altered original! We used a good quality Yahoo Photo image as our own original. It shows a straight railing.

We also have copies of the motherlode photo -the one issued by the UK authotiries in the first place. You can view it on the London Metropolitan Police website. And the Met original is the full size CCTV image -with some background detail not in the Yahoo and other media cropped copies. It too has a straight railing.

So has every version I have seen -except on Whatreallyhappened, and.... Alex Jones -who is also using a similar altered image in an article on his website.

It hard to figure how someone would use an altered original to deflect people away from the Luton CCTV image anomalies.

There could be a few motivations for this move. First, to fool anyone who doesn't know Rivero is not using the original. Second, to throw up a smokescreen of confusion. Third, to focus attention on the railing anomaly and downplay the other 12 problems with that Luton CCTV image. And most important --to narrow the focus of internet investigation of the London bombings --down to a small section of one image.

It's not as clumsy a move as it seems. Without delving fully into it all right now, the interesting thing is that Whatreallyhappened is making the move. This is game on. Now it's up to good researchers/writers to keep their skeptical eye well opened and ensure they are not deflected.

Our approach now should be to keep a broad focus to our research. (We should use the best quality image for photo analysis. That's clearly the Met Police version, which has remained unchanged -I've been saving it daily and checking it's the same.)

Internet sleuths are clearly making progress on the London bombings investigation. The Real investigation. The only real one. But, though the photo is key, but it's just one aspect. And it's not going to run away anywhere. We have the photos.

People need to continue fact checking, incidental and background research, and continue to develop analysis of what was the real scenario, in full that day in London.

Plus, we should save, save, save to local disc. News articles with useful detail will be going offline into paid archives and off forum pages. We need that detail for later research. On both the first and second London 'attacks'.

It's heartening. The London Bombing Black Op is still leaking at the seams.

Report: Evidence Luton CCTV Image is Fake
Article: How Black Ops Staged the London Bombings

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Did Police Lie About Stakeout on Brazilian?

By Kathy Mc Mahon and Fintan Dunne,

26th July, 2005 4pmET

British police may have concocted an elaborate tale of a stakeout on a Brazilian man they shot and killed last Friday, in order to hide an even more unpalatable truth. That they had just killed a person whose only suspicious act was to run for a train.

Jean Charles de Menezes had earlier left his Tulse Hill flat before being shot on the floor of a train carriage which was set to depart Stockwell Tube station.

Let's just discount the police version of events for a moment and assume that Mr. Menezes was entirely unknown to police before he was gunned to death. Simply someone running to catch a train which could be heard pulling into the platform area below.

One eyewitness account supports the proposition that just a single policeman observed Mr. Menezes and then raised the alarm to a three-person special police team on duty in the station. Rob Lowe, from Balham, saw the incident from inside the carriage:
"The tube was stationary and then a man came on who I presume now to be a plain-clothes policeman, but at the time I didn't know who he was," he said.

"He was looking quite shifty, getting up and sitting back down again. I felt a bit awkward around him. And then he seemed to shout at some people on the other platform, who then all came rushing. The tube suddenly filled up with loads of people running down to the end of my carriage. "Then I heard probably four or five loud bangs and saw a bit of smoke " [Source] [also]
Lee Ruston, 32, a construction company director who was on the platform, said that he did not hear any of the three shout "police":
Mr Ruston remembers one of the Scotland Yard team screaming into a radio as they were running. [Source]
That last detail about "screaming" police is puzzling. The whole objective of gunning a suicide bomb suspect quickly to death is to prevent him triggering a bomb. Officers on a mission to stop a detonation would have been more stealthy and composed.

That account of police "screaming" is more consistent with a hysterical police response to a threat to which they had only just been alerted. A response which led them to kill Mr. Menezes.

But if so, they would soon have discovered their catastrophic error. It would be a disaster in public relations terms. So what to do?

What unquestionably did happen then is that senior police officers boosted the image of the force as defenders of the public, by insisting the victim of the shooting was definitely linked to their ongoing antiterrorist operations.

Was that a lie to give them time to construct a scenario which made it more acceptable that they had responded in the way they did?

After discovering the deceased man's address from identifying papers in his clothing, it would be a simple matter to retrospectively claim it was a location they already had under surveillance.
"Police claim they had been watching a redbricked block of flats in Scotia Road after the address had been found in documents left in one of the abandoned rucksacks from the abortive attacks last Thursday." [Source]
Which is hardly reassuring for those already skeptical about the actual source of those rucksacks.

In any event, this reported account of that surveillance shows that the team which killed Mr. Menezes was not the same as those who allegedly followed him to the station:
"The bus journey was slow... When it was obvious that he was getting off at the stop nearest Stockwell Tube station, the team on the bus alerted a three-man team of marksmen to move in. As Mr. Menezes waited to cross the busy main road, the decision was taken at Scotland Yard that he must not be allowed to get to the platform. The marksmen were told: if you think he has explosives under his coat and he fails to heed shouted warnings, then you must shoot to kill." [Source]
Suppose that reported communication from a surveillance team never took place, and the three were responding instead to a local alert of a man running which was unconnected with any prior surveillance.

You might think from this London Times report that Mr. Menezes was in no hurry at all:
"The bus journey was slow, as on any other Friday morning, but Mr Menezes seemed to be in no hurry." [Source]
But the well-founded account below contradicts that spin on events:
"Mr D'Avila, a builder from Sao Paulo who had known Mr de Menezes for two years, spoke to his friend minutes before he stepped off the bus at Stockwell Tube station... He said he was going to be late because of the bus. Then he phoned again to say he was going to be really late because of the Tube. After that, I rang him several times but he didn't answer." [Source]
So it is entirely plausible that Mr. Mendez ran into the station to catch an arriving tube and avoid being even more delayed; and that he was blissfully unaware he was about to be killed as he bounded into the imminently departing carriage --just as do many eager commuters on a daily basis.

Now let's turn to two eyewitness accounts which contradict our unofficial version of events and paint a completely different picture of Mr. Menezes. Accounts which were very widely reported -via the BBC- in the immediate aftermath of the incident. One on BBC News 24 and another on BBC 5 Live.

First, the account by the very observant Mr. Mark Whitby.

His comprehensive account of events reads in large part as a virtual apologia for police actions:
"I was sitting on the train... I heard a load of noise, people saying, 'Get out, get down' I saw an Asian guy. He ran on to the train, he was hotly pursued by three plain clothes officers, one of them was wielding a black handgun.

"He had a baseball cap on and quite a sort of thickish coat - it was a coat you'd wear in winter, sort of like a padded jacket. He might have had something concealed under there, I don't know. But it looked sort of out of place with the sort of weather we've been having, the sort of hot humid weather.

"As [he] got onto the train I looked at his face, he looked sort of left and right, but he basically looked like a cornered rabbit, a cornered fox. He looked absolutely petrified and then he sort of tripped, but they were hotly pursuing him, [they] couldn't have been any more than two or three feet behind him at this time and he half tripped and was half pushed to the floor and the policeman nearest to me had the black automatic pistol in his left hand.

"He held it down to the guy and unloaded five shots into him.

"I saw it. He's dead, five shots, he's dead." [Source] [Source] [Source] [View Video]

Mr. Whitby assures us: "I saw it." Why labor the point? The jacket Menezes was wearing was: "padded"; "thickish"; "might have had something concealed"; "looked sort of out of place." OK, Whitby -we get the picture.

And why labor the issue of which hand the policeman was holding the gun in? That's the sort of detail often drawn out in court testimony and usually missing from impromptu eyewitness statements.

Whitby's colorful "cornered rabbit" account paints an unlikely demeanour onto Mr. Menezes. Were he a bomber, this would fit well. As we now know, he was not.

Another account which we know in retrospect to be strikingly wrong, is that by Anthony Larkin, another passenger, who said he thought the shot man had been wearing a bomb belt.
"I saw these police officers in uniform and out of uniform shouting 'get down, get down', and I saw this guy who appeared to have a bomb belt and wires coming out and people were panicking and I heard two shots being fired," he said. [Source][Source]
What was Larkin using for eyes on that morning? What bomb and wires?

By the way, Larkin's account of officers shouting "get down, get down" matches the phraseology of Whitby's tale of people saying "get out, get down". Arguably, that is because both accounts are accurate in this respect. But this congruence arguably also smacks of collusion.

These widely-reported, early accounts colored our perceptions of what had happened in Stockwell tube station. As did the contemporaneous police insistence that Mr. Menezes was a person of interest to them before being killed.

What if he wasn't? What if the police's interest in where he lived, only arose after they realized they had just killed an entirely innocent Brazilian, and needed to quickly come up with some plausible justification to prevent a public relations meltdown for the London end of the War on Terror?

And we couldn't have that, now could we?

Comment on this article

Monday, July 25, 2005

Cut-outs, Moles, Patsies and Provocateurs

Once when he happened in some connection to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening. The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, "just to keep the people frightened."
-George Orwell, 1984, p127.
by Rasputin, GNN

I have tried, without success, to find a single bombing attributed to “Al-Qaeda” that hasn’t been “masterminded” (according to terrorism “experts” and their mouthpieces in the press) by an informant connected to some or other intelligence agency.

This may suggest a modus operandi on the part of either Al-Qaeda, the intelligence agencies with which her members so frequently interface, or both.

According the TEMPO Interactive, Jakarta in an article of19 Sep 2002, the mastermind of the Bali bomings, Omar Al-Faruq, was a CIA informant.

According to Michel Chussudovsky in his article of 20 June 2004, the bombings in Madrid were also connected to state intelligence agencies.

Kenya? An article in the San Francisco Chronicle on Sunday, November 4, 2001, entitled “AL QAEDA TERRORIST WORKED WITH FBI”, claims that the mastermind of the U.S. embassy attacks in Kenya, Ali Mohammed, was a U.S. government informant.....

Cynthia's Big LIHOP Day Out

Rep. Cynthia Mc­Kinney led a Capitol Hill hearing Friday on whether the Bush administration was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The eight-hour hearing, was an elaborate farce designed to support the LIHOP interpretation of the 9/11 attacks. That's the idea that Bush ignored warnings for political gain.

This is the safe line. The official conspiracy theory.
And these are the official conspiracy theorists.

At the hearing -just to help Cynthia out- were other luminaries such as:
  • Melvin Goodman, a former CIA official
  • Robert Baer, author, former CIA official
  • Melvin Goodman, Fellow, Center for International Policy, former CIA official
  • John Newman, Ph.D., professor University of West Virginia, former NSA analyst
  • Nafeez Ahmed, author of The War on Truth,
  • Paul Thompson, author of The Terror Timeline
  • Peter Dale Scott, Ph.D., author of Drugs, Oil and War
The Rise, Fall ...and
Resurrection -of Cynthia McKinney

The establishment is terrific at anticipating opposition ...and then becoming that opposition themselves before the real thing gets going. They have been doing this for 40 years -so it's a standard MO by now.

Cynthia McKinney was their official 9/11 political scapegoat. Just like Dan Rather was in his own case. And UK Mirror, editor Piers Morgan, by the way.

Take the case of Rather and Morgan first. Two media biggies. One challenged Bush on the AWOL issue, the other challenged Blair on the prisoner abuse issue. Both fell....

Ah... but not really. In fact, they took a dive!

These two are establishment insiders whose job it was to be official scapegoats. Their downfall was designed to intimidate others in the media. Both were and are being well looked after. Loyalty to the 'Party' gets you to the top --and commands you to take a dive when required for strategic purposes.

Now to the case of the apparently brave McKinney. I'd like you to recall what happens to a truly brave politician: Paul Wellstone. That's what happens.

What happened to McKinney? Big jewish money came in and defeated her. And then...?

Political history for a brave politician? Nope. Somehow the power-hungry, murderous people who drove her out of politics --dropped the ball and let her back in again! Are you getting it?

Just as in the case of Rather and Morgan re media, McKinney's downfall was designed to intimidate others in politics. They need to keep 'em in line sometimes.

Now she's back guarding the left flank of the 'Party' again.

Nice work if you can get it.

Stockwell Murder Shatters Brazilian Family

"Jean had lived in Sao Paulo. It is a dangerous city and he knew the rules there ­ if you run away when the police tell you to stop, then you are dead. He knows you don't run away and his English was perfect. There is no explanation for him ignoring a warning because there was no warning. He was murdered. The people who did this ­ the police, the Government ­ should hide their faces in shame." - Alex Pereira
050724_familia03 050724_familia05 050724_familia01View Slideshow

050724_familia06The murder of a Brazilian citizen in London's Stockwell tube station has been blamed by the increasingly shrill Mayor, Ken Livingstone on the alleged 'terrorists' who carried out the bomb attacks.

But terrorists did not hunt down Jean Charles de Menezes and execute him. Police did. 'Gung Ho' maniacs with a licence to kill -issued by U.K. authorities who are guilty of no less than premeditated murder.

Because these are the same authorities playing out an unconvincing charade which pretends 'terrorists' are the cause of recent bomb blasts and alerts. A great lie covering the ruthless actions of black operations teams instructed to murder in support of continuing the imperial war.

Last Friday it was an innocent Brazilian. Tomorrow it could be you. You have to stop this.

See Also:
Police did not warn before firing -witnesses

A number of witnesses have cast doubt on police statements that they shouted a warning or identified themselves to the suspect before opening fire. Lee Ruston, 32, who was on the platform, said that he did not hear any of the three shout “police” or anything like it. Less than a minute later Mr Menezes was pinned to the floor of the carriage by two men while a third officer fired five shots into the base of his skull.

Four Powers Behind al-Qaeda Conspiracy

Former UK Conservative, MP Matthew Parris has just constructed a modern quartet which illuminates the unholy coalition behind the 'Blitz' hysteria in Britain.

He puts his finger on the social forces who are knowingly and unknowingly enabling/creating the War on Terror. This is as close as a pratt like Parris can get to the truth. Bear with me:
"There is an unwitting conspiracy between four separate powers to represent the worldwide al-Qaeda network as fiendishly clever, powerfully effective and deeply involved in the London bombings.

"From a certain point of view, the
journalist, the politician, the police chief and the terrorist can be seen as locked in a macabre waltz of the mind, no less distorting for being unconscious. We should not to join that dance.

Sunday, July 24, 2005

Mainstream Ridicules Visor Terror Drill Hype

Now you will see why two weeks ago I challenged the wild article by Alex Jones that a terror drill by UK security consultants, Visor had acted as a plausible deniability cover for those who carried out the 7/7 London bomb attacks.

I had known it was a setup from the start. These stories are deliberate false decoys designed to allow mainstream media to later ridicule 'conspiracy theories' which turn out to be untrue.

And now, predictably the U.K. TV Channel 4 is using the errors in Alex Jones' article to sneer at bloggers and alternative media. News reporter JJ King writes:
Prison Planet, in an article entitled 'London Underground Bombing "Exercises" argued that the simulated attacks were, whether Power knew it or not, intended to act as a cover for the real ones. News agency Al Jazeera agreed, baldly asserting that 'The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack.'
King then quotes my article debunking Jones (which I knew the mainstream probably would do, but I had to try prevent alternative media walking wholesale into the setup.)
In fact, the 'exercises' he spoke of on Five Live were carried out purely 'on paper', or at least PowerPoint, by a small group of seven or eight executives..." As Fintan Dunne, editor of points out, 'these types of private-sector "risk management" drills never use field staff.
King goes on to damm bloggers as incompetent:
In the light of a brief interview with Power, the 'unbelievable' coincidence of events suddenly seems entirely comprehensible: the train stations targeted, after all, were all in central London -- any planner would pick these amongst a list of possible targets.

'When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras,' goes the often-quoted popularisation of Occam's Razor. In the absence of journalistic nous, bloggers would do well to stick by it.
It's sickening to have the mainstream able to sneer like this. I know they do this all the time. But when they spend three pages like this on a carefully selected "conspiracy theory" --you know that we just goofed by giving them ammunition to portray themselves as guardians of reason. That's how the Jones over-the-top hype damages us.

Visor's eight-person, office-bound terror drill wasn't cover for the black op. The story of the coincident drill was itself the decoy cover.

What is galling is that Peter Power of Visor has actually got very interesting links to Rudi Giuliani and the 'security industry' --both police and private sector. These links help show the nexus of malign vested interest behind the so-called 'War on Terror'.

What is even more galling is that the London bombs black op is full of holes, but that information sort of gets lost as sensational claims fall flat.

Only question is: did Jones hype this story in error or by design?

UK Police Want New Draconian Powers

Senior British police have asked UK Prime Minister Tony Blair for draconian new powers, including the right to detain a suspect for up to three months without charge instead of the current 14 days.

The Association of Chief Police Officers(ACPO) have also asked for a new specialist U.K. border-security agency -along the lines of U.S. Homeland Security.

The police are also seeking to have a suspect's right to silence removed. In a statement they said:
' The obligation placed on company directors in fraud trials to answer questions would have significant benefits if developed into the arena of counter terrorism.'
Police also sought extra funding of £45m ($76) for a new generation of CCTV cameras at ports and airports. The police body further wants to be able to attack and close down Web sites in order to to "suppress inappropriate internet usage."

Saturday, July 23, 2005

Evidence Luton CCTV Image is Fake

To properly see the evidence, open our zoom-in enlargement.
  • The Haversack. A crude job, and it shows.
  • The Half Leg. How does this person walk at all?
  • The Iron Face. The bar should be behind. Is there a face?
  • The Bar Split. The two ends of the crossbar don't line up.
  • The Split Two. Same problem as above. Must be a twist in space.
  • The Face Blur. Face has been darkened and blurred -like the others.
  • The Ghost Bar. Some of this crossbar should be behind the person.
  • The Something. Another anomalous square area. It must be something.
  • The Clown Foot. What a large foot -with a halo effect all around.
  • The Floater. Someone was a bit too heavy with the white reflection.
  • The Peg Leg. Must be a serious fracture. Also yet more halo effect.
  • The Shadow. Why wall shadow if the light comes from behind him.
  • The Square Nose. Must have walked into a door. Interesting eye too.
Original photo here, here, here.

Read Feature Article: How Black Ops Staged the London Bombings


Police Apologise for Shooting Brazillian Dead

LONDON (Reuters) - Police acknowledged on Saturday the man they shot dead on Friday was not connected to bomb attacks on London the previous day, calling the shooting tragic and regrettable.

"We are now satisfied that he was not connected with the incidents of Thursday 21st July 2005," police said in a statement. "For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets".

"The man emerged from a block of flats in the Stockwell area that were under police surveillance as part of the investigation into the incidents on Thursday 21st July. "He was then followed by surveillance officers to the underground station. His clothing and behaviour added to their suspicions," said the statement -which added that the circumstances were being investigated.

See also: Brazil seeks talks with Straw

Bomb Suspect Sawn in Half by UK Police

Shocked London commuters were recovering Saturday after an Asian man was sawn in half earlier today in front of the horrified travellers by a special British anti-terror squad.

The drama began when police guarding a platform began to bundle an unidentified Asian into a wooden box. Several male police officers then began to saw the box in half -while female colleagues wearing fishnet tights amused shocked onlookers.

"You could see his feet poking out of one end of the box and his hands wiggling at the other end, eyewitness Haile Gullible said later. "When they pulled the woden box in half, I was stunned."

Today's terrifying incident came after police yesterday shot another Asian man they had pursued into an underground carriage. Plainclothes police pumped five shots into the man before he eventually said: "Ok, I'm dead." An ambulance arrived on the scene in 4.5 seconds.

But Assistant Chief Police Commissioner, Stephen Spoilberg defended the actions of his men. "I have never worked with a better crew," he told journalists at a press conference. "The atmosphere on the set was terrific. They were so focussed. Props, stunts, post-production -everybody did a great job."

The very observant Mt. Whitby: "The policeman nearest to me had the black automatic pistol in his left hand, he held it down to the guy and unloaded five shots into him." [Source]

Commuter Teri Godly said she stood next to the man before police charged in. "A tall Asian guy, shaved head, slight beard, with a rucksack got in front of me. Shortly after that, as I was about to get onto the train, eight or nine undercover police with walkie talkies and handguns started screaming at everyone to 'get out, get out'." [Source]

The Asian man then bolted down an escalator and tried to get on a train... Train passenger Mark Whitby, an eyewitness to the shooting, said: "He basically looked like a cornered rabbit, like a cornered fox. He looked absolutely petrified. "He sort of tripped but they were hotly pursuing him and couldn't have been more than two or three feet behind him at this time. I saw it. He's dead, five shots, he's dead." [Source]

Another passenger, Rob Lowe, 33, from Balham, saw the incident from another viewpoint in the carriage. "The tube was stationary and then a man came on who I presume now to be a plain-clothes policeman, but at the time I didn't know who he was," he said.

"He was looking quite shifty, getting up and sitting back down again. I felt a bit awkward around him. And then he seemed to shout at some people on the other platform, who then all came rushing. The tube suddenly filled up with loads of people running down to the end of my carriage. "Then I heard probably four or five loud bangs and saw a bit of smoke "I have never heard a gun go off before but the bangs sounded like what I would presume a gun to sound like." [Source] [also]

Anthony Larkin, another passenger, said he thought the shot man had been wearing a bomb belt. "I saw these police officers in uniform and out of uniform shouting 'get down, get down', and I saw this guy who appeared to have a bomb belt and wires coming out and people were panicking and I heard two shots being fired," he said.

Ben Anderson, in the next carriage, spoke of confusion and more shouting. "A lot of people were screaming. The first gunshot was fired and I started to run out of the Tube and up the stairs and then there were a lot of shots afterwards. Outside the police were everywhere, they cordoned off the area very quickly." [Source]

Friday, July 22, 2005

How Black Ops Staged the London Bombings

by Fintan Dunne,
22 July, 2005 12:00pmET

Staged terror events --like magic tricks-- rely on misdirection to throw people off the track. To uncover how the London bombings were carried out by a Western black operations team, we must see through the key misdirections they built into the operation.

The official spin goes like this:

Key evidence of the movements of the four alleged bombers comes from a single CCTV image of four similar-looking individuals entering Luton Station to catch a London-bound train. Three of them had driven to Luton to meet the fourth and carry on by train to King's Cross station in London.

The police claim to have another CCTV video of them splitting up at Kings Cross and heading in different directions to carry out the attacks. Papers identifying them were found at the scenes --where their bodies have also been recovered. Police also found bomb materials in the car they left at a pay carpark in Luton.

That's the tale of the "suicide bombers." The big problem with this account is that a terror group would never deliberately waste valuable human resources in suicide attacks, when suicide tactics are not needed.

In answer, mainstream media are now also pushing the line that they may have been duped --and didn't know the bombs would explode immediately they were set. In alternative media some are also pushing the idea that they simply thought they transporting drugs.

Both explanations assume the four did actually carry the bombs onto London's Underground trains and a bus.

Which of course, they didn't. All this has been misdirection.

Here's how it really went down:

The three who were driving from Leeds to Luton never completed their journey. Somewhere along the M1 motorway, a car with a flashing blue light came up behind them and both cars pulled over to the side of the road. The seeming police officers demanded identification and then insisted that the car be moved off the motorway for safety reasons and for further questioning.

Meanwhile another team was intercepting the fourth person in as he made his way from nearby Aylesbury to Luton. None of them would be seen alive in public again. They did not participate in the bombings.

The CCTV image of them entering Luton Station is a cut and paste of prior surveilance photos taken of the four. This is the key misdirrection.

Intercepting the four would have been much to public once they entered Luton Station. They were taken out before that. Let's come back to what happened to them after we unveil the other key misdirection.

The bombs on the Underground were not in the tube carriages. They were under the floors of the carriages. The black-ops team would need access to rail or maintainance yards in order to plant these timed devices.

That's the reliable way. That's why this was inevitably how it would be done.

Confirmation of this comes from a number of reports, including this eyewitness account of the Aldgate East tube bomb by Cambridge dancer Bruce Lait. He and dance partner Crystal Main were the only passengers in their carriage who survived without serious injury - despite being nearest to the bomb blast.

Here's the Cambridge Evening News report [also]:
"When I woke up and looked around I saw darkness, smoke and wreckage. It took a while to realise where I was and what was going on... " He and Crystal were helped out of the carriage. As they made their way out, a policeman pointed out where the bomb had been.

"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.
Moreover, Christophe Chaboud, head of the French Anti-Terrorism Co-ordination Unit, told Le Monde newspaper that the explosives used in the bombings were of military origin:
He added that the victims' wounds suggested that the explosives, which were " not heavy but powerful", had been placed on the ground, perhaps underneath seats. [Source also]
Or perhaps under the floor.

Causing injuries such as those suffered by Emily Benton, one of two Knoxville, TN sisters on vacation in London who were injured in one of the tube blasts. She had broken bones and skin missing on her feet:
"Her feet were badly injured (the hospital doesn't think she will lose her feet), and she has a bad cut on her arm." [Source]
With much of the carnage taking place underground, it was useful that the bus bomb could provide an above-ground spectacle -and the only sighting of a bomber in action:
BUS blast survivor Richard Jones yesterday revealed how he came face-to-face with one of the London bombers. The Scots IT expert got off the doomed double-decker just seconds before it was torn apart in an explosion that killed 13 passengers.

"This young guy kept diving into this bag or whatever he had in front of his feet," he told The Associated Press.

He said the bomber was around 6ft tall, in his mid-twenties, clean-shaven and smartly dressed. The man was wearing hipster-style fawn checked trousers, with exposed designer underwear, and a matching jersey-style top. 'The pants looked very expensive, they were white with a red band on top... He was standing with his back to me downstairs at the driver's side, which is exactly where the explosion was... The noise was unbelievable. I served an apprenticeship in an explosives factory in Ayrshire so I knew what it was.' [Source]
Which doesn't sound anything like the blue-jeaned, unshaven, rather drably-dressed Hasib Hussain. But the tale of a nervous bomber served to add color to a London landscape which badly needed at least one eyewitness account of the bombers in action.

The bus -like the trains, had a concealed bomb.

Meanwhile, the alleged bombers had been whisked to a remote location to be ruthlessly murdered in a way that would be consistent with their participation in a suicide bombing. They died in a callous blast arranged with military precision.

Four more murders came easily to those who were meanwhile killing scores in London with the same ruthless precision.

Their bodies and body parts would be infiltrated into the forensic investigation. Their identity papers would be "found" at the scenes of the bombings. Their injuries would seem consistent. Their names and their memory smeared forever.

It's war. This is what it's like. Stop it.

Read Latest: Evidence Luton CCTV Image is Fake

Read the analysis of this image

Credits: Team 8+ & WagNews Posters

Our London Bombs Articles:

London Bombers -Did They Board at Luton?
Was Bus Bomber Really Hasib Hussain?
Passport was of the Wrong Hasib Hussain
London Bomb Al-Qaida Suspects Evaporate
Police Get Coy About London Bomb Explosives
French Terror Cop Leaked Bomb Plot Truth
UK Paper Drops Suicide Bomb Theory
Greenspan Fingerprint Found on London Bombs
Dangerous Niggers, Poor Niggers, London Bombs
Glaring Flaw in London Suicide Bombs Tale
Giuliani Linked to London Terror Drill Boss
Alex Jones is Wrong on London Terror Drill
London Bombs Patsy Number 2: Sharon
London bombs: Rise of The G8 New World Order

Man shot dead by police on London Tube

[BBC] - A man has been shot dead by armed U.K. police officers in an incident at London's Stockwell Tube station.

Passenger Mark Whitby told BBC News he had seen a man of Asian appearance shot five times by "plain-clothes police officers" with a handgun. "I saw the gun being fired five times into the guy - he is dead," he said.

Mr Whitby, told BBC News: "I heard a load of noise, people saying, 'Get out, get down'! I saw an Asian guy run onto the train hotly pursued by three plain-clothes police officers. One of them was carrying a black handgun - it looked like an automatic - they pushed him to the floor, bundled on top of him and unloaded five shots into him." [Latest]

WagNews: Dan Copeland, another eyewitness has just told BBC television that the man who was shot was not carrying a bag.

Passport was of the Wrong Hasib Hussain

[BBC] - Evidence showing that all three of the London bombers of Pakistani descent visited Pakistan last year has been thrown into doubt.

On Monday Pakistan's Federal Immigration Agency (FIA) said that Hasib Hussain, with a British passport number, arrived in Karachi from Riyadh in Saudi Arabia on 15 July 2004. Photographs of the passport were published in Pakistan and then around the world.

The passport details are actually those of a teenage boy living in High Wycombe, north-west of London -who has now been interviewed by Pakistani TV station ARY.

'I didn't want people looking at me saying, hey, you are supposed to be dead,' he told ARY, 'or someone saying that there goes the London bomber.'

When contacted by the BBC News website the FIA said: 'We have nothing to say on the matter at this stage.'

See also: London Bomb Al-Qaida Suspects Evaporate

London Blasts Help Extend U.S. Patriot Act

(AP) - The House voted Thursday to extend the USA Patriot Act, the nation's main anti-terrorism tool, just hours after televisions in the Capitol beamed images of a new attack in London.

Forty-three Democrats joined 214 Republicans in voting to renew key provisions of the Patriot Act that were set to expire at the end of the year. The bill includes 10-year extensions to provisions set to expire on Dec. 31, one allowing roving wiretaps.

Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, the top Democrat on the committee, said that while "I support the majority of the 166 provisions of the Patriot Act,'' the extensions could lessen accountability. "Ten years is not a sunset; 10 years is semi-permanent."

President Bush hailed the vote. "The Patriot Act is a key part of our efforts to combat terrorism and protect the American people,'' Bush said in a statement.

The House debate included frequent references to the attacks earlier in the day, two weeks after larger London blasts that killed 56, including four suicide bombers.

US Patriot Act Extending into Europe

The Irish Government has landed in hot water after the public realized that under cover of the London bombings, Irish Justice Minister Michael McDowell, last week signed up to a de facto extension of the U.S. Patriot Act into Ireland.

It's a worrying trend. Back in 2003, the U.S. and EU agreed to extradition and mutual legal assistance. Ireland is now the eleventh of the 25 EU member states to complete the relevant bilateral agreements.

At last week's signing ceremony, US Ambassador, James C Kenny, justified the move thus:
As last week’s bombings in London showed all too well, terrorists can and will strike wherever they are able, and they will take advantage of our open societies... The entire international community must engage the fight against terrorism...

This agreement... allows our governments to form joint investigative teams..., and to replace outdated extradition procedures with provisions that apply across the EU.

In short, this agreement benefits everyone in our respective societies as it enables us to fight crime more effectively and to advance the global war on terrorism.
Sorry, Mr. Ambassador. But, "advancing the global war on terrorism" is not everybody's idea of progress.

The feces just hit the fan with an article in the Irish Cork Examiner pointing out:
The US may ask Irish authorities: To track down people in Ireland; to transfer prisoners in Irish custody to the US; to carry out searches and seize evidence on behalf of the US Government. The Irish authorities must keep all these activities secret if asked to do so by the US.

The person who will request co-operation is US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the man who, as White House counsel, instigated the notorious 'torture memo' to US President George W Bush which advised how far CIA agents could go in torturing prisoners...

In two recent US Supreme Court cases, the US Government argued that US citizens could be imprisoned indefinitely without charge if the president designated them as "enemy combatants".

Irish Council for Civil Liberties director Aisling Reidy said: "An extraordinary aspect to this treaty is, despite its scope and its potential to violate basic constitutional and human rights, that all this happened without debate or transparency.
In earlier comments on all this, noted:
It appears that "some" EU Member States are willing to become "accomplices" to the death penalty, by supplying evidence and witnesses to the US in death penalty trials - even though all EU member states have ratified [protocols] which ban the death penalty absolutely.
Statewatch applied to the Council of Europe for the first two drafts of the EU discussions on the negotiations and was refused. Statewatch appealed against this decision on the grounds that to withhold access on an issue which could have:
"huge implications for peoples' rights and liberties.. [and] it is quite unacceptable in a democracy that such an agreement should be negotiated and agreed in complete secrecy"
In response the Council said on the issue of "public interest" that the:
"interest of protecting the Council's objectives outweighs the interest in "democratic control" of the negotiating process which is referred to by the applicant"
All of this still has to get by European courts -which is not a formality. In a recent ruling on a challenge by the German national Mamoun Darkazanli, who was facing an extradition request from Spain on al-Qaida terrorist charges, the highest German Constitutional Court declared the European Arrest Warrant void:

"The Act encroaches upon the freedom from extradition [because implementation] into national law [must show] the highest possible consideration in respect of the fundamental right concerned. The order of the Higher Regional Court and the judicial authority's decision that grants extradition were reversed." [Source]

See Also:
Highlights of EU-US Justice Cooperation
OSCE Expert Workshop, Vienna, 15 April 2005
Cmtee on Intl. Relations U.S. House of Rep, Sept. 14th, 2004
Secret EU-US agreement being negotiated
Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 June 2003
Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 April 2002
Death Penalty No Block to EU-U.S. extradition, U.S. Says

Heads-up: Ripoff Alert

Brief note. If we incorporate the work of others into our WagNews articles, we link/credit the original. Not everybody does. Some even do the reverse. Dude at nascarblue.blogspot is reprinting our articles. Wouldn't mind so much that he is ripping us -but he is dissing Nico Haupt also.

In our article 'Giuliani Linked to London Terror Drill Boss', we reported how:
"Meanwhile the competent Nico just found exactly how well connected is Mr. Power."
But in nascarblue's version of the article, he claims:
"Meanwhile I've just found out exactly how well connected is Mr. Power."
Naughty, naughty. And it doesn't end there. Even the pedophilia-stories-obsessed Jeff Wells at rigorousintuition has run a version of our 'Greenspan Fingerprint Found on London Bombs', saying that "Fintan Dunne of has also picked up the story."

Not really "also," dude. More like two days earlier.

Let's be careful out there.

Thursday, July 21, 2005

London Bombers -Did They Board at Luton?

We are still waiting for the U.K. authorities to release a CCTV photo they claim to have, showing the alleged London bombers at King's Cross station before they split up. I suspect we will be a long time waiting.

In the meantime, let's take a closer look at the CCTV image of the four suspects entering Luton station supposedly to catch a London-bound train and wreak carnage.

There is an interesting anomaly in the photo which was released --a halo effect around two of the figures we can see. Sometimes these halos can appear as a side-effect of transferring an image from video to computer.

However it could also be because the four individuals have been photoshopped into the image --using earlier individual surveilance photos of the four alleged bombers. For such surveilance photos to exist, we assume these were pre-chosen patsies.

To illustrate, we removed the four from the photo -which is difficult. But, adding them into an empty CCTV image from earlier on the 7th July would be very easy.

Speaking of empty, it also interesting that apart from these four, nobody else is visible in the street -despite the time being 7:20am, well into the buzy morning rush.

Once you realize that the four may never have boarded any train for London -some alternative versions of the events of that day might occur to you.

See Also:
Evidence Luton CCTV Image is Fake
How Black Ops Staged the London Bombings

Small Bomb Incidents Paralyse London

There have been reports of an explosion on the London Underground and three subway lines have been closed temporarily.

Four stations, Warren Street, Shepherds Bush, Oval and Oxford Circus, have been evacuated. Smoke was reported coming from one station.

BBC radio said that several "dummy" bombs or detonators exploded but authorities have not confirmed that. Other reports say an explosion in a haversack being carried by a tube traveller in Warren Street led to the alert.

In the Hackney area, police and sniffer dogs are reported surrounding a bus which had a number of windows blown out by a small device. But, other reports say there is a suspect package on the bus.

There has been just one casualty so far reported arising from the reported incidents.

Was Bus Bomber Really Hasib Hussain?

Eyewitness accounts of a bomber aboard the London bus which was blasted on 7/7/'05 are strangely at variance with each other and with CCTV evidence.

First the question of the description of the man:
BUS blast survivor Richard Jones yesterday revealed how he came face-to-face with one of the London bombers. The Scots IT expert got off the doomed double-decker just seconds before it was torn apart in an explosion that killed 13 passengers.

He said the bomber was around 6ft tall, in his mid-twenties, clean-shaven and smartly dressed. The man was wearing hipster-style fawn checked trousers, with exposed designer underwear, and a matching jersey-style top.

'The pants looked very expensive, they were white with a red band on top... He was standing with his back to me downstairs at the driver's side, which is exactly where the explosion was... The noise was unbelievable. I served an apprenticeship in an explosives factory in Ayrshire so I knew what it was.' [Source]
Does that sound like the blue-jeaned, unshaven, rather drably-dressed Hasib Hussain?

How about this description -again by Jones:
"He described the man as being about 6-feet tall, olive-skinned and clean-shaven, wearing tight, light brown trousers and a light brown top." [Source]
Not really compatible with the CCTV evidence, is it?

As the Scotsman newspaper reported:
"CCTV pictures show him at Luton station at 7:20am. Casually dressed in jeans and a jacket, like any ordinary teenager, he was unlikely to attract attention from busy commuters on the Thameslink train..." [Source]
Then there's the issue of the bag/haversack:
CHARLES GIBSON ABC News: "Could you tell what he was doing with the bag, Mr. Jones?

RICHARD JONES: "Not really. It was a - obviously, a small bag. It didn't go beyond the width of his ankles." [Source]
A "small bag"?

Hussain has a hulking great haversack in the CCTV image.

Finally, the question of exactly where on the bus the bomber was:
Terence Mutasa, 27, a staff nurse at University College hospital, said: "I treated two girls in their 20s who were involved in the bus bomb. They were saying some guy came and sat down and that he exploded. The girls received minor injuries and were in shock and distressed. They said the guy just sat down and the explosion happened. They thought it was a suicide bomber." [Source]
Which seems at variance with Richard Jones' account above.

This bus bombing may well be a vital key to unlocking the real events.


See Also:

London Bombers-
Did They Board at Luton?

[Via Team8+]