Monday, July 25, 2005

Cut-outs, Moles, Patsies and Provocateurs

Once when he happened in some connection to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening. The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, "just to keep the people frightened."
-George Orwell, 1984, p127.
by Rasputin, GNN

I have tried, without success, to find a single bombing attributed to “Al-Qaeda” that hasn’t been “masterminded” (according to terrorism “experts” and their mouthpieces in the press) by an informant connected to some or other intelligence agency.

This may suggest a modus operandi on the part of either Al-Qaeda, the intelligence agencies with which her members so frequently interface, or both.

According the TEMPO Interactive, Jakarta in an article of19 Sep 2002, the mastermind of the Bali bomings, Omar Al-Faruq, was a CIA informant.

According to Michel Chussudovsky in his article of 20 June 2004, the bombings in Madrid were also connected to state intelligence agencies.

Kenya? An article in the San Francisco Chronicle on Sunday, November 4, 2001, entitled “AL QAEDA TERRORIST WORKED WITH FBI”, claims that the mastermind of the U.S. embassy attacks in Kenya, Ali Mohammed, was a U.S. government informant.....

13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, gang! Here is a list of recommended reading.
Knowledge is power. Though only to a small extent for lumpen like us.

5:04 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 5:04 PM. has pointed out an exceptional reading list. If your mind hasn't already been turned into mental spaghetti or twists of tortellini, eat up anyway. This dish is covered in grandma's best sauce, and filled with nutritious meats and cheeses.

6:35 pm  
Blogger atoep said...

I love your site.

8:05 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Channel 4 news tonight, the door to number 10 swinging open ominously, no police outside,

Has HM taken over?

9:11 pm  
Blogger nascarblue said...

Great point. It further proves the 'Power of Nightmare's' straw-man theory. The US media are already attacking Pakistan's Pres. Musharraf for simply
stating the truth yesterday...
that '2/3 of Al Qaeda are either dead or in jail', and the rest are basically ineffective, cornered in desolate mountains, cut off from travelling, and under heavy surveillance.' All the usual right wing attack-bots couldn't wait to denounce the Paki prez on the boob tube today.

With more and more revelations creeping out this past year about the Bushevik's relentless bullying of CIA brass, not to mention the confirmation of DSM..."intelligence being fixed around the facts", it's becoming quite clear that 'Al Qaeda' is mostly a phantom boogey-man.

To take it even further, the Bush administration's policies has been more suited to creating terrorism. The
Bushevik's have caused terrorism to grow 500%!
All this even though we hear all the time that '2/3 of Al Qaeda are out of commission', constant reports of a new Al Qaeda 'bodyguard' or 'lieutenant' being caught, and hardly a day goes by that you don't hear about some new pork bill paying millions to fat-cats to supposedly thwart these 'terrorists'.

What does all that give us instead? It gives us the
National Guard spying on Code Pink and the 'Raging Grannies' on our taxes.
Terrorists no doubt.
They've turned their stacks of outdated CIA files of deceased muslims operatives into nonfiction. Just like 9-11, we're finding out these suspects are still alive.

Still, they've been pretty successful and have further created chao's so they can continue their goals for a new world order. A quintessential red herring.

In the CIA, undercover deaths aren't reported. They get an anonymous star. This was very convenient for the Bushevik's. The CIA files were crammed full of mug-shots of nasty looking hired-hands that would play perfect in prime time. The US has turned into such a hurried narcisstic society , that the saying " a picture is worth (waaaay) more than a thousand words" applies perfectly here.

Now with these London bombings,the subsequent illogical refusal by the US media to report this proven history of cooking the books has not been raised. Not to mention the dozens of other damning facts revealed being revealed on the internet. You couldn't ask for a better example of the differences between the blogging community of empowered citizen journalists and the the mainstream media, who are proving to be made of mostly timid stenographers and bourgeouis elitists. This proves the media not only tows the corporate Bush line, they know the "Al Qaeda" is mostly false. It's just that story sells more Hummers, Pepsi, and Viagra, so screw the facts. No wonder we need reality shows so much, the main thing that is supposed to be real in the US(US govt.), isn't.

4:03 am  
Blogger irishdrifter said...

2/3 of al quida is dead

yup that leaves 1

11:32 am  
Anonymous lukery said...

fintan - this is OT but i noticed a slight morphing in the story about dead brazilian. his apartment building was originally described as an apartment building of eight apartments. we now learn that its "about 10 flats" - which is an odd expression, and we know there was an apartment #17, and another, #21.

im willing to bet that there are more than 10 apartments in the building, the only questions are a) how many? and b) why were they lying?

could you or one of your readers find the answer to how many flats there are in the building? i know its probably just a small thing - but it seems that they originally sold the story that they had a 'reasonable (sounding)' logic for chasing the guy. the more flats there are in the building, the less reasonable this sounds, and if they intentionally told a lie about even this, then it might point to a broader conspiracy, from the beginning, to distort the truth (and theres only one reason why people dont tell the truth, right?)

if my hunch is correct, it is similar to the original story about how they yelled at him in the street and he ran into the station, which slowly morphed into the fact that they were actually watching him when he left the building, and then we learnt he caught the bus, and then we learnt they were on the bus with him etc etc. each iteration being more damning, but increasingly invisible once the original narrative had been established.

cheers

1:57 pm  
Blogger plectic said...

hey. you missed tarpley´s biography of bush´s father...

3:08 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've just been shown this website and done a wee bit reading on your London bombs bit. I'm hardly a great believer in al things Blair, but I'm a little bit puzzled as to why you are getting defensive to Mick for asking questions on your story. Surely it's a good thing to question both sides. I still have doubts, so I was wondering if you could answer any...

If they (the suspect bombers)were 'patsies', how did they become so? Why were they going down to London in the first place?

Where is the evidence of the interception and assassination?

I'm still not convinced that the CCTV camera footage is faked. CCTV is hardly the sharpest of images in the first place so blurriness and halo effects don't seem such a scandalous phenomenon.

If they were intercepted, how can conflicting eyewitness reports prove anything?

By all means, keep digging but there's nothing wrong with your readers being just as rigorous in doubting you too. Keep the chat going!

3:45 pm  
Blogger Stef said...

@anonymous

I'd agree with you about doubts over whether the Luton CCTV still was faked or not. However, if you look at the stills produced after last week's incidents, particularly the one of the guy on the bus, they have most definitely been tampered with.

Even if the faking is debatable the issue of faking is currently less relevant than the fact than none of the actual CCTV footage has been released as clips - not from Luton, not from Kings Cross, not from last week, including the shooting on Friday. The authorities now have reams of the stuff yet they're holding it back. We're then treated to the farce of the release of grainy single stills accompanied by police spokespeople saying 'Have you seen these men?' If they were serious about that they would have released clips but they haven't

Why?

4:50 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OT post ... more good news from the Whitehouse!

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=7174

7:39 pm  
Blogger irishdrifter said...

anon, stef

Please see my latest post!!

The "Shroud of Luton" is most certainly a fake.

Dont just look! See!! Open your eyes!!

Link

7:57 am  
Anonymous Bridget Dunne said...

hi everyone

I can see everyone including me has been really busy on this but I'm finding it really hard to read everything that's been written so sorry if this is duplicated somewhere else on the site

from http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2005/london.bombing/victims.html

On the bus in Tavistock Square:


Philip Stuart Russell, 28, from Kennington, south London, appears to have only taken the bus after being evacuated from the London Underground on his way to work at JP Morgan, PA quoted his family as saying. His father, Grahame, said his son would normally have got off the subway at Moorgate, but in the unfamiliar surroundings of Euston he took the wrong bus. "I am just trying to mourn and grieve his loss. He's a wonderful kid that was in the wrong place at the wrong time," PA quoted Grahame Russell as saying.


Very hard to imagine how he could have ended up anywhere near Euston. Anyone who looks at the way the London Underground joins up can see how everything links, which in many ways works against the planners of this attack but helps us to investigate.

I think the Kennington clue is really important as it is on the Northern line which was closed early on the morning of the 7/7 and police cars seen around Balham station. The massive police operation around Stockwell Kennington Oval that has appeared as a man hunt is I think to shut people up, they don't want anyone talking. Especially after witnessing an execution. The events on the 21/7 are showing us this.

The Shepherds Bush train was opposite the BBC, the Warren Street train besides UCL hospital (where police swooped after 7/7 and many of the injured were taken) the Oval (the Northern line link) and the BUS at Hackney (telling us and them that the bus was diverted on its route from Hackney Wick and not from Marble Arch). Buses were used to ferry the injured to hospital from Kings Cross on 7/7. This is why there is such panic to get these guys (who have injured or killed precisely no-one).

The other coincidence is that all the lines where the 3 incidents happened on 7/7 were closed for about half an hour before 8.30 that day.

The mortuary was set up in the grounds of Armoury House in the City of London (which also has its own police force The City of London police) and the Royal London Hospital where many of the injured did not recover and was visited by the Queen is on Corporation of London ground.


I hope this helps

Thank you Irishdrifter for the pdf totally freaked me out! Now I know what they intend, total world domination




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During times of univeral deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

4:53 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home