Click for better quality
Altered Original of Luton CCTV in Circulation
One fake was bad enough -now there are two!
Cointelpro elements in the alternative media have rushed to try blunt the impact of recent analysis of a faked CCTV image appearing to show the alleged 7/7 London bombers.
Our report, published last Saturday [23rd July], demonstrated 13 clear signs of fakery in the CCTV photo of the four alleged bombers at Luton station, released by the London Metropolitan Police. That evidence is already hitting forums and alternative sites across the internet and the world. So also is our accompanying article explaining how the London bombings were actually carried out.
With the cover-story crumbling, the behind-the-scenes boys had to do some quick damage limitation. And so, WhatReallyHappened.com has just published a photo essay warning people away from questioning the CCTV images released by UK police.
Michael Rivero's series of photos tries to show that one of the 13 anomalies --where a railing appears superimposed in front of one of the men-- is not really an anomaly at all. The man's arm is bent at the elbow, says Rivero -and so the railing is behind him. [see pic] Which might be a good point. But there is one problem. And it's a big one.
Rivero is not using the original Luton CCTV image. He's using an altered version.
In the Rivero version, the railing has been digitally altered so that it bends downwards near the man's body. You could prove anything with an altered original! We used a good quality Yahoo Photo image as our own original. It shows a straight railing.
We also have copies of the motherlode photo -the one issued by the UK authotiries in the first place. You can view it on the London Metropolitan Police website. And the Met original is the full size CCTV image -with some background detail not in the Yahoo and other media cropped copies. It too has a straight railing.
So has every version I have seen -except on Whatreallyhappened, and.... Alex Jones -who is also using a similar altered image in an article on his website.
It hard to figure how someone would use an altered original to deflect people away from the Luton CCTV image anomalies.
There could be a few motivations for this move. First, to fool anyone who doesn't know Rivero is not using the original. Second, to throw up a smokescreen of confusion. Third, to focus attention on the railing anomaly and downplay the other 12 problems with that Luton CCTV image. And most important --to narrow the focus of internet investigation of the London bombings --down to a small section of one image.
It's not as clumsy a move as it seems. Without delving fully into it all right now, the interesting thing is that Whatreallyhappened is making the move. This is game on. Now it's up to good researchers/writers to keep their skeptical eye well opened and ensure they are not deflected.
Our approach now should be to keep a broad focus to our research. (We should use the best quality image for photo analysis. That's clearly the Met Police version, which has remained unchanged -I've been saving it daily and checking it's the same.)
Internet sleuths are clearly making progress on the London bombings investigation. The Real investigation. The only real one. But, though the photo is key, but it's just one aspect. And it's not going to run away anywhere. We have the photos.
People need to continue fact checking, incidental and background research, and continue to develop analysis of what was the real scenario, in full that day in London.
Plus, we should save, save, save to local disc. News articles with useful detail will be going offline into paid archives and off forum pages. We need that detail for later research. On both the first and second London 'attacks'.
It's heartening. The London Bombing Black Op is still leaking at the seams.
Report: Evidence Luton CCTV Image is Fake
Article: How Black Ops Staged the London Bombings