China Censors Internet - So Does the U.S.
"Civil liberties groups have condemned an arrangement between Microsoft and Chinese authorities to censor the internet. A Microsoft portal censors the words 'freedom', 'democracy' and 'human rights' from the Net in China. Yahoo has a similar policy.
"Users who try to include such terms in subject lines are warned: 'This topic contains forbidden words. Please delete them.' A Microsoft spokesman said the restrictions were the price the company had to pay to spread the positive benefits of blogs and online messaging.
"The Chinese government, employs an estimated 30,000 internet police, as part of a long-standing policy to control the web so that it can be used by businesses but not by political opponents.
"For Microsoft, it appears to be a concession to authoritarianism on the net. It comes only months after Microsoft's boss, Bill Gates, praised China's leaders, who have mixed market economics with rigid political control. 'It is a brand new form of capitalism, and as a consumer it's the best thing that ever happened,' he said.
Fintan Dunne Comments: Consider this. Accroding to the report above China has 30,000 internet police. Why? Well, it's part of a long-standing policy to control the web so that it can be used by businesses but not by political opponents.
So do you think the idealogy and practice of the United States would be any different? Of course not. Just well cloaked under a veneer of free expression.
In the U.S., it's less a case of internet 'police' and more a question of internet fake opposition, misdirection websites, front organizations, pseudo-activist groups and a host of professional blogging and web journalism liars, acting in concert to create an impenetrative political and social fog.
These people are all over the internet. They are all over the 9/11 issue; all over the stolen election of 2004; all over the psychological operations designed to inspire fear of earth changes, global warming, the State and the NWO; all over the landscape of anti-corporate, anti-fascist expression on the Internet.
This army of information controllers is all over the 'free' information you are getting on the Internet.
Open your eyes.
See them.
posted by FintanDunne
at 2:48 pm
9 Comments:
Damn fucking right dude
Well Fintan you said See Them. You have come to this conclusion. Please share with us the criteria you feel distinguishes a fake site from a real one or some examples you know of. WE can all learn from you more that way
You can find an interesting story on BreakforNews suggesting that the photos showing the top of the South Tower falling unevenly to the side were faked. As all video footage of the South tower collapse show exactly the same toppling, then what is Fintan really suggesting, the whole thing was faked? Was it just some computer generated animation? Sounds curiously like the hologram plane theories.
The biggest single smoking gun in this crime, is the collapse of the towers. The video records of that event are all that remains as evidence, since all forensic evidence has been destroyed. Now we have Fintan making the claim, the photos are faked. You have to wonder why.
For the record, the simple reason why depth appears different in various photos is because some were shot from near the towers while others were shot at a distance with a telephoto lens. As for the smoke anomalies, just freeze frame any of the videos of the event (any angle) and you'll see the exact same scene again and again.
Hey, to "BlowingSmoke", I have never seen any video of the 911 towers falling where the TOP segment (of either tower) ever tips... at all.
Both of 'em just come straight down in every video angle I've ever seen.
(And "straight down" in under 15 seconds which is free-fall speed, proof enough of controlled demolition IMHO, and which is more than enough smoking gun to prove 'inside job'... but I digress...)
Anyway, personally I've reserved judgement on Fintan's "fake fotos" claims (honestly dunno which way to go on that one, really)...
BUT if YOU have some source of a tower-collapse VIDEO which SHOWS such top-tipping, as alleged in these still photos... please provide a link!!
Don't just say-so... SHOW us!
Probably the most accessible source would be 13mins 53secs into Eric Hufschmid's video titled "A Closer Look" available for free download here http://www.hugequestions.com
Download link http://www.erichufschmid.net.nyud.net:8090/911.wmv
25 mins and 16 secs into Dylan Avery's video "Loose Change" shows this scene from a different angle. This video is available for free download http://www.letsroll911.org using Bittorrent.
38mins and 30 secs into Jimmy Walter's video "Confronting the Evidence" available at http://www.reopen911.org you also see the first couple of seconds of the South Tower collapse.
1hr and 24mins into Alex Jone's "Martial Law" also shows the toppling South Tower.
Of course there are many raw clips available via emule and the like, captured from live TV coverage as well as amateur footage, which is not surprising given the number of camera's pointed at the towers. In fact it really astonishes me that so many people haven't bothered to fully check this stuff out for themselves.
If the only 911 video footage available was a ghosted, blury, black & white image filmed off a projector screen at the Pentagon, then its authenticity would be questionable. However with so many collaborating, independent sources and no conflicting evidence, shouldn't we be focusing on exposing the issue of, how could the towers fall so fast and why would the top section of the South tower disintegrate into dust while in free fall?
Hi again "Smoke"...
OK I checked your sources but the only video I had quick access to was the Alex Jones DVD.
And you're right -- ya gotta watch it "step" frame by frame and there's actually only ONE FRAME which clearly shows the "tipping"... but it's there.
SO... hmm. Seems to me, yah, maybe Fintan's mistaken about his "top tipping was faked fotos" theory, but nobody's right 100% of the time, eh? His other analysis here seems pretty good to me 99% of the time, so cut the brutha' some 1% slack maybe. LOL.
(Fintan plz comment if u are there?)
Bottom line: IMHO as they all said on the 911 panel discussion on Coast to Coast AM radio this week, it's CLEAR that the official story is fully bogus and discredited now now matter WHAT side you come to study 911 from. We all need to focus only on the major smoking guns and don't let minor side issues divide people into unproductive squabbling about shite that doesn't matter.
The TOWERS FELL in UNDER 12-15 SECONDS which is mathematically provable as "free fall speed" i.e. with NO RESISTANCE at ALL from the 70+ floors of undamaged (by -plane- OR -fire-) STEEL and CONCRETE construction.
That's an explosive controlled demolition, thus proof of conspiracy, thus end of argument. Tell your friends just this... and never mind all the BS side issues.
Something very curious about Alex Jone's 911 videos are that they only show the collapses at 4x normal speed. Perhaps I'm wrong but I don't believe he shows the full collapse anywhere and any video shown is at high speed. Perhaps it is just for dramatic effect, perhaps I'm making something out of nothing?
Of course Michael Moore's effort doesn't even show the collapses at all. For artistic reasons I'm sure?
Is this just a coincidence or is there an effort to avoid the biggest and most obvious smoking gun?
To Who is Blowing Smoke?:
You almost took the words right out of my mouth (with regards to Fintan's Faked Photos story)! I also noticed that in this case Fintan definitely blew it. I have a good clear reproduction of the Amy Sancetta photo and I e-mailed Mr. Dunne pointing out how he had made some dreadful errors in his analysis. I also told him, if he was really interested in the truth, as he claims, he should admit his mistake. But no admission was ever forthcoming. So, as much as I hate to admit it, it is becoming clearer and clearer to me that Fintan Dunne "doth protest too much" about disinfo agents within the 9/11 truth movement. Why is he trying to cast aspersions on this 9/11 researcher and that? I have never read of any other internet-journalist so interested in calling into question the motives behind other researchers. Why? Listening to one of his shows, I learned that he had discovered that Mike Rivero's father works in the oil industry. Aha, goes Fintan, that's why he is always talking about Peak Oil. Well, I have been a long-time reader of WRH and I never got the impression that he (Rivero) was going on and on about Peak Oil. He mentioned it a few times from what I saw and that was it. But Fintan is like "look he might be another disinfo agant because he is trying to sell the Peak Oil scam!" I mean, come on, give me a break! I think someone should start looking into the associations of Fintan Dunne and see where THEY lead, just so Fintan gets a taste of his own medicine. Like maybe his father worked for the RAF and did some undercover work? T'would be interesting.
Trouble is, I still love listening to his shows.
That is quite disturbing as I also wrote to Fintan about his erroneous PhotoFaking article also. I wonder how many others did as well?
It is certainly looking like Fintan isn't who he pretends to be and the finger pointing by him may not be motivated by a desire to expose the truth but an agenda to help obfuscate it.
Maybe this is nothing but it is interesting to note the New Age inference in his radio show intro music, "Push me onto the next level". Innocent as it may sound it does have a much deeper meaning. It would be interesting to find out how deep the rabit hole goes, there is much more to BreakForNews than meets the eye.
Post a Comment
<< Home